Daily News
High Court Order Dairie to Leave Amritsar by Dec 31 After 25 Years
Introduction
In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has ordered the eviction of all dairies from Amritsar.

A significant ruling has been passed with the High Court order dairie to leave Amritsar, ending a 25-year legal struggle. The Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed all dairies in the walled city and residential areas to move out by December 31, setting a strict timeline for compliance.
The order came from a division bench led by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sanjiv Berry. They instructed the Municipal Corporation of Amritsar to serve eviction notices within two months. If dairy owners refuse to comply, the corporation, with police support, can enforce the eviction.
This case began in May 2000 when the Dairy Welfare Union challenged eviction notices on behalf of 1,650 dairy owners. Initially resistant, the owners later agreed to relocate if provided with affordable developed plots. By July 2000, over 1,300 undertakings had been filed, showing willingness to shift.
In October 2001, the Municipal Corporation reported that dairies had been moved and resettlement complexes were built. However, confusion persisted, and the court recently found that 430 dairies still operate in the city, raising concerns about hygiene and sanitation.
The court noted that 106 developed plots remain vacant even after decades. These include 42 plots of 300 square yards and 74 plots of 600 square yards. Despite available resettlement options, many dairies continue to function in residential zones, affecting public health.
The directive now makes it mandatory for dairy owners to accept relocation. Notices must be served promptly, and owners will be given fair opportunity to move into vacant resettlement plots. Failure to comply will invite police-assisted eviction.
However, this decision underlines the court’s firm stance on sanitation and community welfare. By ensuring dairies shift out of crowded residential areas, the ruling aims to safeguard the living environment of Amritsar residents.
In conclusion, the High Court order dairie to leave Amritsar marks a decisive step toward improving hygiene and living conditions. With the December 31 deadline fixed, attention now turns to how efficiently authorities implement the eviction and resettlement process.
Daily News
Court Orders Compensation After Tree Accident at Carmel Convent
On July 8, 2022, a tragic accident occurred at Carmel Convent in Chandigarh.

On July 8, 2022, a tragic event shook Chandigarh when a centuries-old peepal tree fell inside Carmel Convent during school hours. The incident happened at lunchtime and caused the death of one student while injuring 19 others. This heartbreaking accident raised strong concerns about tree safety in public areas. Soon after, the High Court delivered a major ruling, and court orders compensation after tree accident became the headline that drew national attention.
Daily News
Injured Labourer Attack in Sector 26 of Chandigarh
In Chandigarh’s busy Sector 26, a labourer was attacked over a dispute about money.

In Chandigarh’s busy Sector 26, an argument over money turned violent when a labourer was attacked. The victim, Nanke, works at the Sabzi Mandi and lives in Phase-1, BDC. On the night of September 25, around 10 pm, he went to buy momos near Munna Turn. What began as a small issue with change soon escalated into a serious fight. This shocking case is now being reported as injured labourer attack in sector 26.
Nanke had ordered momos worth ₹100 and gave a ₹500 note. When he asked for change, the vendor, Rahul, grew angry and scolded him for not carrying smaller notes. Their heated argument soon turned into violence. Rahul’s friend Tanu joined in and started beating Nanke, knocking him to the ground.
The situation became worse when Rahul grabbed a sickle from his stall. He struck Nanke twice on the right leg, leaving him badly injured. Hearing the commotion, Sunil, Nanke’s roommate, rushed to help and managed to take him back to their room.
Realizing the seriousness of his injuries, Nanke was taken to the Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32. Doctors treated his deep wounds caused by the sickle attack. After stabilizing, he decided to take legal action.
On September 29, Nanke filed a complaint with the police. He named both Rahul and Tanu in his statement and explained how they attacked him. Police quickly registered a case under Sections 115(2), 126(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, ensuring legal steps against the accused.
This incident highlights the risks faced by labourers who work in crowded markets like Sabzi Mandi. Such areas are important for daily trade but also prone to disputes. Punjab, where Chandigarh is located, has long depended on agricultural labour. Workers often rely on markets for their earnings, yet they also face challenges like conflicts, low wages, and unsafe conditions.
Moreover, crime in Punjab has shown an increase in recent years. Disputes among vendors and buyers sometimes turn violent, especially in crowded areas. This case shows how quickly a simple argument over money can become a serious crime.
Families of workers like Nanke often worry about their safety. Incidents like this not only affect individuals but also create fear in the community. Market areas serve business and livelihood, but they must also keep buyers and sellers safe.
The police now face the challenge of ensuring stricter monitoring in such busy places. More patrols, better conflict resolution, and awareness campaigns can reduce such violent disputes. At the same time, community members must learn to resolve arguments peacefully before they spiral out of control.
For Nanke, the road to recovery will be difficult. He must heal from his physical injuries and also deal with the trauma of the attack. For the wider community, this case is a reminder of the need for stronger safety measures in public markets.
In conclusion, the injured labourer attack in sector 26 shows how a simple disagreement can end in violence. As police move forward with the case, the focus must remain on justice for the victim and safety for all citizens in Chandigarh’s crowded markets.
Daily News
Panchkula Lawyer and Two Accomplices Convicted for Wife Murder
A lawyer named Manmohan Singh, along with his girlfriend Monika and her brother-in-law Sandeep Gill, has been found guilty of murdering Singh’s wife, Rajni.

A shocking case in Chandigarh reached a turning point as lawyer Manmohan Singh, his girlfriend Monika, and her brother-in-law Sandeep Gill were found guilty of killing Singh’s wife, Rajni. The verdict confirmed that two accomplices convicted for wife murder, and the court will announce their sentences on Tuesday.
Rajni, a 36-year-old mother of two, went missing on January 16, 2018. Despite years of searching, police never recovered her body. Yet investigators presented strong evidence that exposed the conspiracy.
The prosecution showed how Singh, Monika, and Sandeep planned the crime together. All three lived in Manimajra, part of Chandigarh. Phone records played a key role. Rajni spoke to Monika several times, including a 20-minute call on January 13 and one final call on January 16, just before she vanished.
During interrogation, Monika confessed. She admitted her romantic relationship with Singh. She also revealed that Singh ordered Rajni’s murder. According to her, they strangled Rajni inside a moving car and later disposed of her body.
Police arrested Singh near Suraj Theatre soon after. The probe revealed that Rajni left her home at 11:15 am on January 16, telling family she was going to the market. Her phone was last active in Sector 21 at 12:15 pm after her call with Monika, before it was switched off.
Singh’s actions deepened suspicion. He reported Rajni missing the same day. Four days later, he misled police by pointing to a garbage dump in Sector 23, claiming a woman’s body was there. Officers searched and found only a dead dog, proving Singh tried to confuse investigators.
Rajni’s brother Naresh Kumar, a daily wage worker in Kharar, testified about the couple’s troubled marriage. Singh married Rajni in 2004, and they had two children, aged 9 and 11 at the time. Naresh said Singh abused Rajni often and resented her family’s poor financial background. He also recalled that Singh once threatened both him and Rajni.
Police registered a case at Sector 20 police station. They charged Singh, Monika, and Sandeep under Section 346 (wrongful confinement), Section 364 (kidnapping), Section 302 (murder), and Section 120B (criminal conspiracy). These charges reflected the brutality of the crime.
This case highlights the dangers of domestic violence and the urgent need for stronger protections. Rajni’s story shows how abuse within families can escalate into deadly crimes, leaving children and families shattered.
Authorities hope this ruling pushes society to act against domestic abuse. Communities must ensure that women feel safe in their homes and that legal systems respond quickly to protect victims.
In conclusion, the conviction of Singh, Monika, and Sandeep proves that justice is possible even without a recovered body. However, the ruling that two accomplices convicted for wife murder sends a clear message: domestic violence and conspiracies will not go unpunished, and no one is above the law.
-
Entertainment2 years ago
Top 11 Punjabi Comedians of All Time
-
Entertainment2 years ago
Top 15 Punjabi Models – Male and Female List
-
Jobs4 years ago
Top 20 IT Companies in Mohali
-
City Guide2 years ago
3B2 Mohali Market Shops: Discover 44 Hidden Gems
-
Property2 years ago
Who Lives In Homeland Mohali: Punjabi Celebrities, Business People…
-
Food4 years ago
11 Best Restaurants in Mohali You Must Visit
-
Education2 years ago
10 Famous Punjabi Writers With A Great Impact On The Literary World
-
Food3 years ago
Top 15 Cafes in Mohali you must visit