Connect with us

Daily News

Punjab De-Addiction Scam: ED Freezes ₹21 Crore Linked to Amit

Enforcement Directorate Takes Action in Punjab’s De-addiction Sector

In a significant development, the Jalandhar Zonal Unit of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has frozen multiple bank accounts associated with Dr.

Published

on

Punjab De-Addiction Scam: ED Freezes ₹21 Crore Linked to Amit

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has intensified its probe into the Punjab de-addiction scam, freezing bank accounts worth Rs 21 crore linked to Chandigarh-based physician Dr. Amit Bansal and his family. The investigation points to large-scale drug diversion and money laundering tied to 22 private de-addiction centres across Punjab, and authorities have shut them down. Authorities allege that individuals illegally diverted prescription drugs meant exclusively for registered patients for profit, raising grave concerns about public health and safety.

This action follows earlier investigations by the Punjab Vigilance Bureau, which arrested Dr. Bansal for misusing Adnoc-N, a regulated combination of Buprenorphine and Naloxone used in opioid treatment. Officials suspect that instead of helping addicts, he sold the medication to non-registered users. Although he is currently out on bail, the closure of his centres has delivered a major blow to Punjab’s fragile rehabilitation system.

On July 18, the ED conducted sweeping raids in Chandigarh, Ludhiana, Barnala, and Mumbai to seize evidence, including restricted tablets, incriminating documents, and electronic devices now under forensic review. Investigators also confiscated cash from a Ludhiana hospital. These findings are expected to further expose the scope of the alleged illegal trade.

One hospital in Nakodar reported nearly 1.44 lakh tablets missing from its stock, deepening suspicions of systemic manipulation. Officials believe Dr. Bansal may have obscured the discrepancies with the help of departmental staff. The ED has since registered four FIRs against his centres in Jalandhar, Ludhiana, and Patiala, while also naming Ludhiana-based Drug Inspector Ruppreet Kaur as a co-accused.

The revelations carry serious public health implications. Punjab has long battled an opioid crisis, and the diversion of controlled substances undermines rehabilitation efforts while endangering lives. Instead of aiding recovery, the misuse of medicines like Adnoc-N erodes trust in the healthcare system and worsens the drug epidemic.

Authorities stress that they expect further arrests as new evidence surfaces. Past inquiries, including one by a former deputy commissioner in Jalandhar, had already flagged irregularities at Dr. Bansal’s centres, strengthening the current case.

In conclusion, the freezing of Dr. Bansal’s accounts marks a turning point in addressing the Punjab de-addiction scam. The ED’s continued vigilance is crucial for restoring faith in medical institutions, ensuring accountability, and protecting vulnerable individuals in a state that urgently needs effective drug rehabilitation solutions.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Daily News

Lakers vs Mavericks: LA Wins Sixth Straight Game 129-119 Behind Reaves’ 38 Points

Published

on

Lakers vs Mavericks LA Wins Sixth Straight Game 129-119 Behind Reaves' 38 Points
AI Generated

The Lakers vs Mavericks matchup on November 28, 2025, delivered an exciting finish as Los Angeles secured their sixth consecutive victory. The Lakers defeated Dallas 129-119 at the Crypto.com Arena. Consequently, LA finished the NBA Cup group stage with a perfect 4-0 record and advanced to the knockout round as the No. 2 seed in the West.

Austin Reaves stole the show with an outstanding performance. He led all scorers with 38 points on incredibly efficient 12-of-15 shooting. Meanwhile, his scoring prowess kept the Lakers ahead during crucial moments. Additionally, LeBron James contributed with his veteran experience and court awareness throughout the game.

 On the other side, Luka Dončić put up impressive numbers for Dallas. He scored 35 points on 10-of-17 shooting and dished out 11 assists. Furthermore, his playmaking abilities kept the Mavericks competitive throughout the contest. Despite his efforts, Dallas couldn’t maintain consistent momentum to secure the victory.

The game remained close throughout all four quarters. Dallas even took the lead once during the fourth quarter, making fans anxious. However, the Lakers responded strongly each time the Mavericks threatened. Moreover, LA’s defensive adjustments in crucial moments made the difference.

Anthony Davis played limited minutes but remained effective. He finished with 12 points on 6-of-10 shooting in just 28 minutes. Additionally, he grabbed 5 rebounds, provided 5 assists, and blocked 3 shots. His efficiency demonstrated his impact even with reduced playing time.

PJ Washington led the offensive charge for Dallas with solid scoring and rebounding. Similarly, young Cooper Flagg showed promising skills during his minutes on the court. Nevertheless, the Mavericks struggled with defensive consistency, allowing the Lakers to build and maintain their lead.

The second quarter proved pivotal as Dallas scored 40 points to take a brief lead. Subsequently, the momentum shifted when Reaves and Dončić engaged in a scoring duel. Both players elevated their games, creating an entertaining spectacle for fans.

The third quarter saw the Lakers regain control. Reaves continued his hot shooting, while LeBron James provided crucial baskets. Furthermore, LA’s defense tightened, preventing Dallas from establishing any comfortable rhythm. The Lakers entered the fourth quarter with renewed confidence.

In the final period, Dallas made one last push. They briefly grabbed the lead with strong play from their bench. However, the Lakers responded immediately with a decisive run. Eventually, LA’s superior execution in the closing minutes sealed the victory.

This win extends the Lakers’ impressive winning streak to six games. They now prepare to face the No. 3 seed San Antonio Spurs in the knockout round. Meanwhile, the Mavericks must regroup after struggling in conference action with a 2-9 record.

The Lakers vs Mavericks contest showcased high-level basketball with multiple lead changes and exceptional individual performances. Both teams demonstrated offensive firepower, but ultimately, LA’s consistency and depth proved decisive in securing another important victory.

Continue Reading

Daily News

Oxford Union Debate Cancelled: Indo-Pak Face-Off Ends in Controversy and Accusations

Published

on

Oxford Union Debate Cancelled Indo-Pak Face-Off Ends in Controversy and Accusations
AI Generated

A highly anticipated Oxford Union debate on India’s Pakistan policy collapsed on Thursday night amid confusion and accusations between the two delegations. The event, scheduled to discuss the motion “This House Believes That India’s Response to Pakistan Is a Populist Strategy Sold as Security Policy,” never took place. Instead, the evening descended into public recrimination and conflicting statements.

The debate organizers faced criticism from the start. Moosa Harraj, the Oxford Union President, organized the event. Notably, he is the son of Pakistan’s Minister of Defence Production. Additionally, Raza Nazar, another Pakistani national, served as the Treasurer. Therefore, questions arose about potential bias in the organization.

The original Indian speakers, former Army Chief General MM Naravane and Dr. Subramanian Swamy, withdrew just two days before the debate due to unavoidable commitments. Consequently, organizers scrambled to find replacement speakers. Senior advocate J Sai Deepak flew from Delhi and handled his court hearings remotely from London to participate. Furthermore, UK-based activist Manu Khajuria and dharmic scholar Pt. Satish K Sharma joined him at the last minute.

However, chaos erupted on the day of the debate. At 3:13 pm local time, Sai Deepak received a call saying the Pakistan team had not landed in London. Later, at 4:55 pm, Harraj admitted he had known since 10 am that Pakistan’s speakers would not attend. The Pakistani delegation included Zubair Mahmood Hayat, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, and former foreign minister Hina Rabbani Khar.

Meanwhile, the Oxford Union offered the Indian speakers a debate against students rather than against other speakers. The Indian team declined this alternative arrangement, believing it changed the fundamental nature of the event.

At 2:44 pm, the Pakistan High Commission in London tweeted that the Indian delegation had withdrawn. Moreover, they claimed this “last-minute decision reflects a lack of confidence” in defending India’s Pakistan policy. The statement accused India of preferring “partisan media platforms” over “neutral and intellectually rigorous debate.”

 Sai Deepak strongly disputed these claims. He learned on Friday that the Pakistan delegation had actually arrived in Oxford. Therefore, he accused the event organizers of acting as a “mouthpiece for the Pakistan High Commission.” He criticized the entire arrangement as “shambolic” and full of organizational failures.

“If we knew the Pakistan team had landed, we would have debated them,” Sai stated. He challenged the Pakistani speakers to find the courage to debate if they were still in Oxford. Additionally, he described the situation using colorful language, calling it “Operation Manhoos ki phati hui Baniyan.”

The Indian speaker emphasized that instead of conducting a civil debate, the Oxford Union allowed Pakistan to claim a false victory. Furthermore, he noted that other prominent Indians, including Shiv Sena MP Priyanka Chaturvedi and marketing consultant Suhel Seth, had been approached too late to participate effectively.

This controversial cancellation of the Oxford Union debate highlights the challenges of organizing politically sensitive international discussions and the importance of transparent communication among all parties involved.

Continue Reading

Daily News

Air India Crash Investigation: Tensions Between US and Indian Authorities Over Probe

Published

on

Air India Crash Investigation Tensions Between US and Indian Authorities Over Probe
AI Generated

The Air India crash investigation has revealed significant tensions between Indian and American authorities following the tragic Flight 171 accident. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed on June 12 near Ahmedabad shortly after takeoff, killing 260 people. Consequently, this became the first fatal crash involving a Dreamliner aircraft.

The disaster killed all but one of the 242 passengers and crew aboard the flight. Additionally, 19 people on the ground died when the aircraft plummeted into a medical student hostel. Therefore, investigators from both countries rushed to determine what caused this devastating accident.

However, the probe quickly encountered serious disagreements between officials. The main flashpoint came in late June when two US National Transportation Safety Board specialists arrived in New Delhi. Indian authorities had arranged for them to take a late-night military flight to a remote facility in Korwa. Meanwhile, they planned to analyze the flight data and cockpit voice recorders there.

 Jennifer Homendy, chair of the NTSB, urgently intervened to block this plan. She cited security concerns flagged by the US State Department regarding terrorism and military conflicts in the region. Furthermore, embassy officials rushed to stop the specialists at the airport. As a result, the team remained in Delhi instead of traveling to the remote location.

The US side repeatedly pushed for the immediate extraction of black-box data in either Delhi or Washington. Moreover, Homendy warned she would withdraw American support if delays continued. She issued a 48-hour ultimatum demanding that Indian authorities choose between these two locations. Subsequently, she made urgent calls to transportation officials and executives from Boeing and GE Aerospace.

Indian officials eventually agreed to download the black-box data in Delhi using specialized equipment supplied by the NTSB. Nevertheless, this became a high point of tension between the two investigating teams.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the preliminary data showed that switches controlling fuel flow to both engines moved to cut off shortly after takeoff. The switches transitioned from run to cutoff one after another at a one-second interval. Additionally, cockpit recordings suggested the first officer attempted to recover the aircraft while the captain remained calm.

These findings led many American government and industry officials to privately believe the evidence points toward deliberate action. However, Indian officials remain cautious about endorsing this interpretation without a complete investigation.

GVG Yugandhar, chief of India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, emphasized his agency’s capabilities during the probe. He reportedly told American investigators that India wasn’t a “Third World country” and could handle the investigation independently.

The Supreme Court of India issued notices to the government and the aviation regulator, DGCA, regarding the case. The court observed that nobody should be blamed prematurely, stating “the pilot is not to be blamed… it was an accident.” Therefore, the court emphasized the need for a thorough investigation before concluding.

The Air India crash investigation continues with enormous stakes for global aviation safety. Boeing’s Dreamliner remains one of the world’s most widely used long-haul jets, making this investigation critically important for international air travel.

Continue Reading

Trending