Daily News
Sarbat Khalsa Organization Opposes Anti-Sacrilege Law in Punjab
Background on the Anti-Sacrilege Bill
The Punjab Assembly is discussing a new law called the anti-sacrilege bill.
The Punjab Assembly is currently debating the anti-sacrilege bill, which seeks to protect religious texts, particularly the Guru Granth Sahib, from disrespect. However, the Sarbat Khalsa Organization Opposes this bill, expressing strong reservations about its effect on freedom of expression and the Sikh community’s ability to discuss faith openly.
In a letter to the Assembly’s select committee, the organization made its stance clear. They believe that punishing individuals for their views could spread fear across society. Moreover, they stressed that the government has failed to punish those responsible for previous sacrilege incidents, making new legislation appear more like a distraction than a solution.
The group reminded lawmakers that past sacrilege cases still haunt Sikhs deeply. They emphasized that introducing a new law cannot heal the community’s wounds without accountability for past wrongs. Instead, they called for measures that address the core issues and ensure lasting justice.
One of their main objections centers on Gurmeet Ram Rahim, chief of Dera Sacha Sauda. His parole has angered many Sikhs who see him linked to earlier sacrilege acts. They also recalled the 2015 police shooting of peaceful protesters, insisting that justice for those lives remains overdue.
Legal experts consulted by the organization found flaws in the bill. They argued that the Supreme Court already recognizes Guru Granth Sahib as a juristic person, and the bill risks lowering this sacred legal standing by comparing it with other texts. They also warned of possible misuse, as the bill lacks clarity in defining sacrilege, leaving room for unfair targeting of individuals.
The group further argued that the proposed law could suppress valuable debate within Sikhism. Since different groups interpret texts in varied ways, vague definitions could silence discussions vital for deeper understanding and growth of faith.
They also stressed the special role of Guru Granth Sahib as more than scripture, it is regarded as a living Guru, central to Sikh life. Any law concerning it, they said, must preserve this unique spiritual and legal status.
In conclusion, the organization urged the government to act with care and engage in meaningful dialogue. They do not reject protection for sacred texts but insist on solutions that honor the Guru Granth Sahib’s standing without undermining freedom of thought. The Sarbat Khalsa Organization Opposes the bill because they believe true progress lies in justice, accountability, and inclusive discussion rather than vague new laws.
Daily News
Court Orders Compensation After Tree Accident at Carmel Convent
On July 8, 2022, a tragic accident occurred at Carmel Convent in Chandigarh.
On July 8, 2022, a tragic event shook Chandigarh when a centuries-old peepal tree fell inside Carmel Convent during school hours. The incident happened at lunchtime and caused the death of one student while injuring 19 others. This heartbreaking accident raised strong concerns about tree safety in public areas. Soon after, the High Court delivered a major ruling, and court orders compensation after tree accident became the headline that drew national attention.
The court directed the Chandigarh Administration to pay ₹1.5 crore in total compensation. Out of this, ₹1 crore will go to the family of the student who lost her life, while ₹50 lakh will support a girl who lost her arm in the accident. The administration must also cover all her medical expenses, including surgeries and the cost of a prosthetic arm.
This ruling came after a plea filed by the injured student and the deceased girl’s family. They relied on a government panel’s inquiry report, which highlighted serious lapses in safety. The Chandigarh Administration initially described the tragedy as an “act of God,” claiming it was beyond human control. However, the High Court rejected that argument, ruling that the administration failed to take proper care and showed negligence toward student safety.
The inquiry, led by retired Justice Jitendra Chauhan, confirmed that the tree collapsed suddenly without warning. Injuries affected several students and even a bus attendant. The findings stressed the urgent need for better safety systems for old and heritage trees.
Justice Chauhan suggested multiple preventive measures. One of the strongest ideas was the creation of a “Green Brigade,” a group involving Resident Welfare Societies. This team would monitor, inspect, and help manage trees across the community.
The report also included these key steps:
- Regular inspection of heritage trees.
- Ultrasonic tests to check the health of old trees.
- Identification and removal of dead or dry trees.
- Faster approval processes for cutting dangerous trees.
- Phasing out eucalyptus trees due to their weak branches and fast growth.
The High Court ordered the Chandigarh Administration to adopt all these recommendations without delay. Parents and residents welcomed the decision, as they felt schools should be safe places for children. Many demanded answers as to why such an old tree was not regularly inspected, despite being close to a school campus.
This incident has started a wider conversation on urban tree management. In many Indian cities, older trees face risks from age, pests, or structural weakness. Chandigarh, often praised for its greenery, must now balance beauty with safety. Regular monitoring of trees near schools, playgrounds, and public spaces has become a priority demand.
Community members hope the proposed Green Brigade will serve as a model for other regions. By including local citizens in monitoring, the city could achieve stronger accountability and faster action. Environmentalists also believe this ruling will push for a new approach to urban planning—where safety, ecology, and community participation work together.
The Carmel Convent tragedy has left behind grief but also lessons. It reminds society of the shared responsibility to protect children and prevent avoidable accidents. Many citizens are now watching closely to see how the administration follows the court’s orders. Families of the victims continue to pray for the recovery of the injured and remember the life that was lost.
In conclusion, the court orders compensation after tree accident serves as both a warning and a call to action. With better planning, community involvement, and strict monitoring, Chandigarh can ensure safer public spaces and prevent future tragedies.
Daily News
Injured Labourer Attack in Sector 26 of Chandigarh
In Chandigarh’s busy Sector 26, a labourer was attacked over a dispute about money.
In Chandigarh’s busy Sector 26, an argument over money turned violent when a labourer was attacked. The victim, Nanke, works at the Sabzi Mandi and lives in Phase-1, BDC. On the night of September 25, around 10 pm, he went to buy momos near Munna Turn. What began as a small issue with change soon escalated into a serious fight. This shocking case is now being reported as injured labourer attack in sector 26.
Nanke had ordered momos worth ₹100 and gave a ₹500 note. When he asked for change, the vendor, Rahul, grew angry and scolded him for not carrying smaller notes. Their heated argument soon turned into violence. Rahul’s friend Tanu joined in and started beating Nanke, knocking him to the ground.
The situation became worse when Rahul grabbed a sickle from his stall. He struck Nanke twice on the right leg, leaving him badly injured. Hearing the commotion, Sunil, Nanke’s roommate, rushed to help and managed to take him back to their room.
Realizing the seriousness of his injuries, Nanke was taken to the Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32. Doctors treated his deep wounds caused by the sickle attack. After stabilizing, he decided to take legal action.
On September 29, Nanke filed a complaint with the police. He named both Rahul and Tanu in his statement and explained how they attacked him. Police quickly registered a case under Sections 115(2), 126(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, ensuring legal steps against the accused.
This incident highlights the risks faced by labourers who work in crowded markets like Sabzi Mandi. Such areas are important for daily trade but also prone to disputes. Punjab, where Chandigarh is located, has long depended on agricultural labour. Workers often rely on markets for their earnings, yet they also face challenges like conflicts, low wages, and unsafe conditions.
Moreover, crime in Punjab has shown an increase in recent years. Disputes among vendors and buyers sometimes turn violent, especially in crowded areas. This case shows how quickly a simple argument over money can become a serious crime.
Families of workers like Nanke often worry about their safety. Incidents like this not only affect individuals but also create fear in the community. Market areas serve business and livelihood, but they must also keep buyers and sellers safe.
The police now face the challenge of ensuring stricter monitoring in such busy places. More patrols, better conflict resolution, and awareness campaigns can reduce such violent disputes. At the same time, community members must learn to resolve arguments peacefully before they spiral out of control.
For Nanke, the road to recovery will be difficult. He must heal from his physical injuries and also deal with the trauma of the attack. For the wider community, this case is a reminder of the need for stronger safety measures in public markets.
In conclusion, the injured labourer attack in sector 26 shows how a simple disagreement can end in violence. As police move forward with the case, the focus must remain on justice for the victim and safety for all citizens in Chandigarh’s crowded markets.
Daily News
Panchkula Lawyer and Two Accomplices Convicted for Wife Murder
A lawyer named Manmohan Singh, along with his girlfriend Monika and her brother-in-law Sandeep Gill, has been found guilty of murdering Singh’s wife, Rajni.
A shocking case in Chandigarh reached a turning point as lawyer Manmohan Singh, his girlfriend Monika, and her brother-in-law Sandeep Gill were found guilty of killing Singh’s wife, Rajni. The verdict confirmed that two accomplices convicted for wife murder, and the court will announce their sentences on Tuesday.
Rajni, a 36-year-old mother of two, went missing on January 16, 2018. Despite years of searching, police never recovered her body. Yet investigators presented strong evidence that exposed the conspiracy.
The prosecution showed how Singh, Monika, and Sandeep planned the crime together. All three lived in Manimajra, part of Chandigarh. Phone records played a key role. Rajni spoke to Monika several times, including a 20-minute call on January 13 and one final call on January 16, just before she vanished.
During interrogation, Monika confessed. She admitted her romantic relationship with Singh. She also revealed that Singh ordered Rajni’s murder. According to her, they strangled Rajni inside a moving car and later disposed of her body.
Police arrested Singh near Suraj Theatre soon after. The probe revealed that Rajni left her home at 11:15 am on January 16, telling family she was going to the market. Her phone was last active in Sector 21 at 12:15 pm after her call with Monika, before it was switched off.
Singh’s actions deepened suspicion. He reported Rajni missing the same day. Four days later, he misled police by pointing to a garbage dump in Sector 23, claiming a woman’s body was there. Officers searched and found only a dead dog, proving Singh tried to confuse investigators.
Rajni’s brother Naresh Kumar, a daily wage worker in Kharar, testified about the couple’s troubled marriage. Singh married Rajni in 2004, and they had two children, aged 9 and 11 at the time. Naresh said Singh abused Rajni often and resented her family’s poor financial background. He also recalled that Singh once threatened both him and Rajni.
Police registered a case at Sector 20 police station. They charged Singh, Monika, and Sandeep under Section 346 (wrongful confinement), Section 364 (kidnapping), Section 302 (murder), and Section 120B (criminal conspiracy). These charges reflected the brutality of the crime.
This case highlights the dangers of domestic violence and the urgent need for stronger protections. Rajni’s story shows how abuse within families can escalate into deadly crimes, leaving children and families shattered.
Authorities hope this ruling pushes society to act against domestic abuse. Communities must ensure that women feel safe in their homes and that legal systems respond quickly to protect victims.
In conclusion, the conviction of Singh, Monika, and Sandeep proves that justice is possible even without a recovered body. However, the ruling that two accomplices convicted for wife murder sends a clear message: domestic violence and conspiracies will not go unpunished, and no one is above the law.
-
Entertainment2 years agoTop 11 Punjabi Comedians of All Time
-
Entertainment2 years agoTop 15 Punjabi Models – Male and Female List
-
Jobs4 years agoTop 20 IT Companies in Mohali
-
City Guide2 years ago3B2 Mohali Market Shops: Discover 44 Hidden Gems
-
Property2 years agoWho Lives In Homeland Mohali: Punjabi Celebrities, Business People…
-
Food4 years ago11 Best Restaurants in Mohali You Must Visit
-
Education2 years ago10 Famous Punjabi Writers With A Great Impact On The Literary World
-
Food3 years agoTop 15 Cafes in Mohali you must visit