Connect with us

Daily News

Swiggy Ordered to Pay Compensation for Short Delivery of Oranges in Panchkula

A recent ruling has brought attention to online grocery delivery services in Panchkula, Haryana.

Published

on

Swiggy Ordered to Pay Compensation for Short Delivery of Oranges in Panchkula
ChatGPT Generated (Not a Real Image)

A recent consumer court ruling has drawn attention to online grocery delivery services after Swiggy ordered to pay compensation for short delivery in Panchkula, Haryana. The case involved Raja Vikrant Sharma, a local advocate, who faced issues with his grocery order from Swiggy. This decision has started a serious discussion about customer rights, service quality, and accountability in online shopping.

Raja lives in Panchkula, part of the Chandigarh Tricity area, which also includes Mohali and Chandigarh. On December 30, 2024, he placed an order through the Swiggy app. His order included one kilogram of Nagpur oranges and a Nestle Classic Milk Chocolate. He also paid ₹28.61 as a handling fee, expecting quick and safe delivery.

However, the delivery failed to meet expectations. The orange packet was torn, and the weight was only 824 grams instead of the promised 1 kilogram. He also did not receive a physical bill for the purchase. When Raja contacted Swiggy’s customer care, he got no proper response.

Raja had bought the oranges as a gift for his aunt in Shimla. Because of the delay and damaged packaging, his plan failed. The issue caused him stress, extra expense, and wasted time. Being a lawyer, Raja filed a complaint with the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Chandigarh.

The commission reviewed the case in detail. It said that delivering less than what was ordered amounts to a deficiency in service. Indian consumer protection laws clearly say that customers must receive the correct quantity they pay for.

Swiggy, however, argued that it only provides a digital platform linking customers to third-party sellers such as grocery stores and restaurants. The company claimed it should not be blamed for the seller’s mistakes.

After examining the evidence, the commission disagreed. Raja had submitted a photo showing the torn packaging and reduced weight. The commission confirmed that Swiggy failed to deliver the complete quantity. It also noted that Raja faced mental distress and inconvenience.

In the verdict, the consumer court held Swiggy responsible. It ordered the company to pay ₹2,000 as compensation to Raja for mental agony and trouble, along with his legal costs. The ruling sends a message that online service providers must ensure correct delivery and good-quality products, even when acting as intermediaries.

This decision shows the growing need for consumer awareness in India’s fast-growing e-commerce market. Millions use mobile apps daily for groceries and food, expecting honest service. Such rulings remind companies that ethical business practices and effective complaint handling are essential.

India’s consumer protection laws give citizens the power to fight unfair services. Experts believe this case will encourage both businesses and consumers to act more responsibly.

As online shopping becomes more common, maintaining trust is key. Companies must deliver accurate orders and fix issues quickly to keep customers happy.

Raja’s case stands as an example of how even a small claim can bring big change in consumer justice. When people speak up, businesses are more likely to improve their service. This ruling, where Swiggy ordered to pay compensation for short delivery, reminds every company that honesty, quality, and accountability must always come first.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Daily News

Vijay Hazare Trophy Live: Star Players Return as India’s Premier 50-Over Tournament Begins

Published

on

Vijay Hazare Trophy Live
AI Generated: Not a real image

The Vijay Hazare Trophy live matches kick off on Wednesday, December 24, bringing India’s top domestic 50-over cricket tournament back into focus. Moreover, this season carries extra excitement as several big names make their return to the competition.

Virat Kohli steps onto the Vijay Hazare stage for the first time in nearly 16 years. Similarly, Rohit Sharma returns after almost eight years away from the tournament. Both veterans recently showed excellent form against South Africa, consequently proving they remain crucial for India’s 2027 World Cup plans.

However, fans won’t get to watch matches at the M Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru. Instead, organizers moved games to BCCI’s Centre of Excellence to prevent overcrowding after the recent stampede during RCB’s IPL celebration.

Key Players to Watch

Several Mumbai Indians stars will compete across different state teams:

Player State Team Current Form
Rohit Sharma Mumbai Two recent half-centuries vs South Africa
Suryakumar Yadav Mumbai Needs runs badly (avg 12.84 in T20Is)
Hardik Pandya Baroda 77* in recent SMAT match
Shardul Thakur Mumbai Explosive 73 off 28 balls vs Nagaland
Robin Minz Jharkhand 166 runs in SMAT

Furthermore, Suryakumar Yadav desperately needs this tournament. His T20I form has collapsed over the past year with no half-centuries in 22 innings. Therefore, these matches give him a perfect chance to regain confidence before the New Zealand series on January 21.

Rishabh Pant, meanwhile, will play all seven group matches for Delhi. This extended run offers him an opportunity to force his way back into India’s limited-overs plans.

Tournament Format and Opportunities

The competition has proven extremely competitive recently. Indeed, five different teams have won the last five seasons. Karnataka, the defending champions, welcome back Karun Nair, who smashed an incredible 779 runs last season at an average of 389.5.

Additionally, strong performances here often lead to bigger opportunities. Last year, Arshdeep Singh and Varun Chakravarthy’s excellent bowling earned them national team recalls and eventually Champions Trophy spots.

All matches start at 9am to reduce dew impact. Consequently, winning the toss becomes crucial as fast bowlers will find helpful morning conditions.

Young talents like R Smaran and experienced players seeking IPL contracts will view this as their audition stage. Teams play across four venues: Bengaluru, Jaipur, Ahmedabad, and Ranchi.

As the Vijay Hazare trophy live action unfolds over the coming weeks, cricket fans can expect thrilling contests, career-defining performances, and perhaps the emergence of India’s next big stars. The tournament runs until mid-January, giving players ample time to stake their claims for higher honors.

Continue Reading

Daily News

Income Tax Refund Risk Management: CBDT Warns Taxpayers to Review Invalid Claims Before December 31 Deadline

Published

on

Income Tax Refund Risk Management
AI Generated: Not a real image

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has launched an income tax refund risk management initiative, urging taxpayers to voluntarily check their tax returns for incorrect claims. Moreover, the department identified numerous cases where people claimed deductions or exemptions they weren’t entitled to receive.

Through its “NUDGE” campaign (Non-intrusive Usage of Data to Guide and Enable), the tax department sends SMS and email alerts to affected taxpayers. Consequently, this allows them to correct mistakes before facing formal inquiries.

What Did the Tax Department Find?

Using advanced data analytics, CBDT discovered several problematic patterns in Assessment Year 2025-26 returns:

Issue Type Description
Bogus Donations Fake donations claimed to Registered Unrecognised Political Parties (RUPPs)
Wrong PANs Incorrect or invalid Permanent Account Numbers of recipients
Ineligible Exemptions Claims for deductions taxpayers don’t qualify for
Incorrect Amounts Wrong calculation of deduction or exemption amounts

Furthermore, these errors led to understatement of income and wrongful refund claims.

Important Deadline and Actions

Taxpayers identified under this campaign must act quickly. Specifically, they need to file revised income tax returns by December 31, 2025. However, those who miss this deadline can still submit updated returns from January 1, 2026, though they’ll need to pay additional tax liability.

Additionally, the CBDT clarified an important point: taxpayers whose claims are genuine and legally correct don’t need to take any action. Therefore, only those with questionable claims should worry about this campaign.

Why This Campaign Matters Now

The timing of this initiative appears significant. Indeed, income tax refunds have dropped notably this year. Between April 1 and December 17, 2025, the department issued refunds totaling ₹2.97 lakh crore-a 13.52% decline compared to last year’s same period.

Meanwhile, the campaign has already shown positive results. Over 2.1 million taxpayers voluntarily updated their returns for previous years (2021-22 to 2024-25) during FY 2025-26, paying more than ₹2,500 crore in additional taxes. Similarly, another 1.5 million taxpayers revised their current assessment year returns.

How to Respond to the Notice

If you receive an SMS or email from the Income Tax department:

  1. Review your ITR carefully – Check all deduction and exemption claims
  2. Verify donation receipts – Ensure PANs and amounts match records
  3. Calculate correctly – Confirm you qualify for claimed benefits
  4. File revised return – Submit corrections before December 31, 2025
  5. Keep documentation – Maintain proof of legitimate claims

Subsequently, this proactive approach helps avoid penalties and formal assessments later.

The income tax refund risk management framework represents the department’s shift toward technology-driven compliance. Rather than launching aggressive investigations, authorities now encourage voluntary corrections through data-based nudges. Ultimately, this approach benefits both taxpayers and the government by reducing disputes while improving tax collection efficiency.

Continue Reading

Daily News

Yuvraj Singh: Viral Bat Auction Claim Debunked; ED Attaches Assets in Betting Case

Published

on

Yuvraj Singh
AI Generated: Not a real image

Former Indian cricket star Yuvraj Singh finds himself in the news for two completely different reasons. Moreover, one story involves a misleading viral claim, while the other concerns a serious legal matter with the Enforcement Directorate.

The Bat Auction Claim: What’s True and What’s False

A viral social media post claims that Lalit Modi auctioned Yuvraj Singh’s bat-the one used to hit six sixes in an over during the 2007 T20 World Cup-for ₹7 crore. However, this claim is misleading.

What Actually Happened:

Fact Details
The Promise Lalit Modi offered a Porsche to anyone hitting six sixes in an over
The Achievement Yuvraj Singh accomplished this against England in 2007
The Gift Modi gave Yuvraj a Porsche worth ₹91 lakh
The Exchange Modi asked for the bat in return
Current Status The bat remains with Modi at his London home

Furthermore, Modi confirmed in two recent podcasts-one with Raj Shamani (November 2024) and another with Stuart Clarke (August 2025)-that he still possesses the bat. Specifically, he mentioned that when Yuvraj asked for the Porsche, Modi requested the historic bat in exchange.

Additionally, no credible auction house or media organization has reported any such auction. Indeed, if a bat sold for ₹7 crore, it would have generated massive media coverage, especially since Shane Warne’s iconic cap sold for only ₹5.79 crore.

ED Takes Action: Assets Attached

Meanwhile, Yuvraj Singh faces a more serious situation. On December 19, 2025, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) provisionally attached assets worth ₹7.93 crore belonging to Yuvraj and several other celebrities.

Who Else Is Involved?

The ED action includes:

  • Former cricketer Robin Uthappa
  • Actors Sonu Sood, Neha Sharma, Ankush Hazra
  • Model Urvashi Rautela and her mother
  • Former MP Mimi Chakraborty

Why Did ED Take This Action?

The investigation centers on the illegal offshore betting platform 1xBet. Consequently, the ED alleges that these celebrities knowingly promoted the platform through surrogate brands like 1xBat and 1xBat Sporting Lines.

Specifically, the agency discovered that:

  1. Illegal Operations – 1xBet operated in India without authorization
  2. Hidden Payments – Money came through foreign entities to hide illegal origins
  3. Surrogate Marketing – The platform used fake brands to target Indian users
  4. Layered Transactions – Payments went through multiple foreign intermediaries

Previously, in October 2025, the ED also attached ₹11.14 crore worth of assets belonging to cricketers Shikhar Dhawan and Suresh Raina in the same case.

Important Warning

The ED cautioned celebrities and influencers against promoting illegal betting platforms. Similarly, they advised the public to avoid such platforms and report suspicious activities to law enforcement agencies.

Therefore, Yuvraj Singh now faces scrutiny over his alleged endorsement activities, while simultaneously dealing with false viral claims about his cricket memorabilia. These parallel situations highlight how celebrities must carefully manage both their public image and business associations in today’s digital age.

Continue Reading

Trending