Connect with us

Daily News

High Court Upholds Compensation in Railway Death Case, Cites Peak-Hour Overcrowding

Published

on

High Court Upholds Compensation in Railway Death Case, Cites Peak-Hour Overcrowding
AI Generated

The Bombay High Court upholds compensation in railway death case involving a commuter who fell from a local train during peak hours. Justice Jitendra Jain ruled that standing near train doors due to overcrowding cannot be considered negligence. Moreover, the High Court upheld compensation in a railway death case and dismissed the Union government’s appeal against the 2009 Railway Claims Tribunal decision.

The tragic incident occurred on October 28, 2005, when the deceased fell while traveling from Bhayendar to Marine Lines on the Western Railway line. Unfortunately, he died from his injuries a few days later. Subsequently, the Railway Claims Tribunal awarded compensation to his family members.

Railways’ Arguments Rejected: The Railways challenged this decision, arguing that the victim displayed negligent conduct. They argued he chose to stand on the footboard near the door voluntarily. However, the court disagreed with this view.

Additionally, the Railways claimed no ticket or pass was recovered from the body. Therefore, they argued he was not a genuine passenger. Nevertheless, the court found this argument weak.

Court’s Key Observations

Justice Jain acknowledged the harsh reality of Mumbai’s suburban railway system. During morning peak hours, trains running from Virar to Churchgate become extremely crowded. Consequently, passengers often have no choice but to stand near doors.

The bench noted that commuters traveling for work “have no choice but to risk” standing in dangerous positions. Furthermore, this situation remains unchanged to this day, making it a systemic problem rather than individual negligence.

Important Points from the Judgment

Aspect Court’s Ruling
Standing near the door Not negligence during peak hours
Overcrowding A ground reality, not the passenger’s choice
Ticket/Pass issue Wife produced a valid pass and ID card
Legal definition Falls under “untoward incident.”
Compensation Rightfully awarded to dependants

Understanding “Untoward Incident”

The court clarified that no law excludes compensation when someone falls due to overcrowding. Moreover, such accidents fall under the definition of an “untoward incident” according to railway law. Therefore, families deserve compensation in these cases.

Evidence Presented: The deceased’s wife presented his valid local train pass and identity card before the Tribunal. Consequently, the court accepted these documents as genuine proof. Furthermore, the court stated that forgetting to carry a pass on one particular day does not disqualify dependants from receiving compensation.

Impact on Future Cases: This judgment sets an important precedent for similar cases. It recognizes that Mumbai’s suburban railway system forces passengers into dangerous situations. Besides that, it protects the rights of commuters who travel in overcrowded conditions daily.

The court emphasized that ignoring this reality would be unfair to millions of daily commuters. Additionally, railway authorities must take responsibility for providing safe travel conditions.

Finding no fault in the Tribunal’s original ruling, the High Court upholds compensation in railway death case and disposed of the Railways’ appeal. This decision brings closure to the family after nearly two decades of legal battles. Moreover, it sends a strong message about passenger rights and railway accountability.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Daily News

ITR Refund Delays: Why Taxpayers Are Still Waiting and How to Check Status

Published

on

ITR Refund Delays
AI Generated

Many taxpayers continue experiencing ITR refund delays months after the September 16 filing deadline. Although the Income Tax Department processed most refunds, thousands remain pending. Moreover, several factors contribute to these delays, ranging from bank account issues to data mismatches.

Common Reasons Behind Delays

Understanding why refunds get stuck helps taxpayers resolve issues faster. Here are the main causes:

Issue Impact
Wrong bank details Refund cannot be credited
Aadhaar-PAN not linked System blocks processing
Data mismatches Triggers manual verification
Incorrect claims Requires additional documents
Unvalidated bank account Payment fails automatically

Processing Timeline

Normally, the Income Tax Department credits refunds within 4-5 weeks after e-verification. However, this year stricter screening processes have extended waiting times. Furthermore, the Centralized Processing Centre in Bengaluru examines large refunds more carefully.

Ravi Agrawal, Chairman of the Central Board of Direct Taxation, explained that authorities analyze high-value claims flagged by the system. Additionally, they send notices to taxpayers requesting revised returns when needed.

How to Check Your Refund Status?

Follow these simple steps to track your refund status:

  1. Visit the income tax portal at eportal.incometax.gov.in
  2. Log in using your User ID and password
  3. Click on ‘e-File’ tab
  4. Select ‘Income Tax Returns’
  5. Choose ‘View Filed Returns’
  6. Click ‘View Details’ to see your refund status

The portal shows whether your refund is issued, under review, or pending additional information.

Key Problems and Solutions

Bank Account Issues: Double-check your account number and IFSC code. Also, ensure your bank account is pre-validated on the portal. Any mismatch between your PAN name and bank account name will block the refund.

Data Mismatches: Inconsistencies between Form 26AS, Annual Information Statement (AIS), and Form 16 trigger manual reviews. Therefore, verify all documents match before filing. If you find errors, submit feedback through the portal or file a corrected return.

Multiple Income Sources: Taxpayers with stock market activities or foreign income face longer verification times. Consequently, these cases require more detailed examination.

What to Do If Your Refund Is Stuck?

If your refund hasn’t arrived within five weeks, take these steps. First, check your email for notices from the Income Tax Department. Next, review the portal for any discrepancy messages. Then, raise a grievance ticket if necessary. Finally, ensure your PAN remains active and linked to Aadhaar.

Tax experts believe ITR refund delays stem from enhanced verification procedures rather than system failures. As the backlog clears, processing times should improve gradually.

Continue Reading

Daily News

UK Court Sentences Afghan Teenager Who Brutally Raped a 15-Year-Old British Schoolgirl

Published

on

UK Court Sentences Afghan Teenager Who Brutally Raped a 15-Year-Old British Schoolgirl
Source: X (Twitter) Account

The case of the Afghan Teenager who brutally raped a 15-year-old British schoolgirl has caused deep shock across the UK, especially because both attackers were asylum-seeking minors living in government-funded care. Two 17-year-olds, Jan Jahanzeb and Israr Niazal, targeted the girl in Leamington Spa after she became separated from her friends.

Continue Reading

Daily News

Social Media Ban for Children Under 16: Australia Leads Global Reform

Published

on

Social Media Ban for Children Under 16 Australia Leads Global Reform
AI Generated

Australia launched its groundbreaking social media ban for children under 16 on Wednesday, December 10, 2025. This world-first legislation requires major platforms to remove accounts belonging to users under 16 years old. Moreover, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described this move as families taking back power from tech giants.

Affected Platforms and Penalties

Ten major platforms now face strict age restrictions. Consequently, these companies must verify user ages and remove underage accounts. Otherwise, they risk massive fines.

Banned Platforms Maximum Fine
Facebook, Instagram AU$49.5 million
TikTok, Snapchat ($32.9 million USD)
X (Twitter), YouTube Per platform
Reddit, Twitch, Kick, Threads If non-compliant

However, several platforms remain exempt from the ban. These include Roblox, Discord, WhatsApp, YouTube Kids, and Messenger. Additionally, the government considers these platforms “low risk” for children.

How Age Verification Works?

Different platforms use various methods to verify ages. For instance, TikTok combines technology with human moderation. Similarly, Snapchat tracks user behavior alongside birth dates. Furthermore, Meta uses facial recognition through a tool called Yoti. Meanwhile, Reddit employs age prediction models.

If platforms mistakenly identify someone as underage, users can appeal. Therefore, they must provide government IDs or undergo facial recognition checks to prove their age.

Implementation Challenges

Despite the law’s intentions, some children have already found workarounds. Specifically, reports show kids drawing facial hair to fool age verification systems. Additionally, older siblings help younger users bypass restrictions. Nevertheless, Communications Minister Anika Wells warned these tactics won’t work forever.

“These platforms have so much data on users,” Wells explained. “Even if children avoid detection today, platforms will eventually catch them through routine checks.”

Already, TikTok has deactivated over 200,000 Australian accounts. Still, enforcement remains challenging during these early stages.

Public Response

Public opinion strongly supports this reform. Indeed, polls show two-thirds of Australian voters back the ban. Furthermore, parents whose children suffered from online harm praised the legislation. Wayne Holdsworth, whose son died from an online sextortion scam, called it an important start.

However, not everyone celebrates the change. Simone Clements explained how the ban affects her 15-year-old twins, who work as entertainers. Their social media presence serves as their portfolio and income source. Therefore, the ban creates financial consequences for young performers.

Global Influence

Several countries now closely watch Australia’s experiment. Notably, Malaysia, Denmark, and Norway plan to introduce similar bans. Meanwhile, the European Union is considering adopting comparable regulations.

eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant will monitor platform compliance. She plans to release preliminary results before Christmas. After that, a legal review will take place approximately 2 years later.

The social media ban for children under 16 represents a bold step toward protecting young Australians online. While implementation challenges exist, supporters believe this reform will change lives worldwide.

Continue Reading

Trending